Trajectory privacy protection is critical to the development of Internet of Vehicles (IoV), which makes it important to summarize and analyze existing research methods. Existing IoV trajectory privacy protection methods can be divided into three categories: trajectory obfuscation, pseudonym change and trajectory encryption. Trajectory obfuscation can be achieved based on users' real trajectory or dummy trajectory. Pseudonym change can be achieved based on mix-zone or path confusion. Trajectory encryption can be achieved based on Private Information Retrieval (PIR) protocol or spatial transformation. Firstly, the research background and common attacks were introduced and summarized in this paper. Secondly, existing IoV trajectory privacy protection methods were surveyed from the aspects of methodology, scientific problem and method evolution. The problems need to be further studied also were elaborated. Furthermore, the performances of representative schemes were summarized, such as privacy protection, attack resistance and complexity. Finally, the future research directions of IoV trajectory privacy protection was prospected.

In order to ensure the correctness of program execution in the safety critical system, the error control theory is used to encode the computer instructions, but the algorithm involves the modular operation, resulting in high additional complexity and difficulty to use in real-time systems. Aiming at reducing the additional complexity, delta code's multiplication and division algorithm was improved. The idea of redundancy encoding and differentiated ideology was introduced to ensure security, while the inverse element was introduced into division to transform division into multiplication, thus avoiding the overhead of the modular operation and reducing the additional complexity while improving the security of the algorithm. Theoretical analysis shows that the undetected error rate is proved to be 2.3*10 ^-10. Simulation results show that the undetected error rate of the proposed algorithm is consistent with the theoretical value, and the complexity is 6.4-7.2 times of the original algorithm, but 7%-19% lower than original delta code. The proposed algorithm satisfies the requirements of safety critical application systems in terms of error detection rate and complexity.